A Woman in Trouble
Just by coincidence last night I re-read Jonathan Rosenbaum's essay "A Cinema of Uncertainty: Films by Michelangelo Antonioni" (1993). At the beginning of this piece, Rosenbaum names the twelve greatest directors in the world, "not so much personal favorites as individuals who, in [his] estimation, have done the most to change the way we perceive the world and are likeliest to be remembered and valued half a century from now." It struck me that of the dozen men cited twenty-nine nears ago only two remained living.
And now, sadly, just one (Hou Hsiao-hsien).
When, nineteen years ago, I created this blog, I chose Jean-Luc Godard as half its namesake not because he was my personal favourite director, but rather because – apart from sharing two-thirds of my initials – Godard seemed to me the quintessential brilliant, prickly, serious, artistic filmmaker. I had sought out aggressively every Godard movie I could find (then, mostly through Ebay, snatching up VHS tapes and bootleg discs), seen probably 15 or so, and just read Colin MacCabe's Godard: A Portrait of the Artist at Seventy, which cemented my impression of this iconoclastic giant of post-war European art. I was an admirer and a convert.
For still younger generations who regard cinema/cinephilia as much as a religion (encompassing art, politics, history, philosophy, almost all facets of life) as did Godard's Nouvelle Vague peers, JLG was something of a mythic high priest. Yet, unlike many revered elderly figureheads, Godard remained utterly vital to the last, creating a series of astonishing films in the twenty-first century that rival or surpass his more famous '60s heyday. 2001's Éloge de l'amour, the first in that late-career renaissance, was one of the first movies I ever wrote about at length – a review that, evidently, has mercifully vanished from the memory of the Internet.
While I don't necessarily agree with the logic of Rosenbaum's above-quoted criteria for defining the world's greatest filmmakers, it certainly fits for Godard. He has genuinely and significantly impacted the way that I, and many other people, perceive the world; and there is no doubt at all that his name, reputation, and oeuvre will endure –– far beyond a mere half-century.
Sic transit gloria mundi.
This year's EuroBasket has been terrific! Such high-level, intensely competitive basketball, nearly every game – much more so, in fact, than many early-to-mid NBA regular season games, which are sometimes phoned in or missed entirely by stars given time off for rest.
One could argue, too, that Eurobasket 2022 included the three best players in the world right now at this moment, although Jokić/Serbia was knocked out by Italy in a super exciting game earlier today. But, as I write this post, we could still very conceivably end up with a Giannis vs. Luka championship game a week from now!
Some notes on Days of Heaven
I was invited by VIFF to introduce a screening (on 35mm!) of Days of Heaven as part of their terrific "Summer in the '70s" series. Here's what I came up with (though I opted at the last minute to cut the last paragraph in case some might consider it a spoiler):
Five Things
01. Paschasius Radbertus's Epitaphium Arsenii is the greatest, and most inexhaustibly fascinating, literary prose text of the earlier Middle Ages. Mayke de Jong and Justin Lake's English translation, extensive annotations, and critical apparatus are all superb.
02. Delbert Mann's film version of Terence Rattigan's Separate Tables is quietly masterful –– and unexpectedly relevant for our present moment in time, despite having been made in 1958. David Niven's Oscar-winning performance is devastating.
03. FKA Twigs' "Killer" is the best single so far this year. If it's a sign of things to come, she might give Rosalia some real competition for album of the year.
04. Joan Micklin Silver's Between the Lines is one of the great workplace comedies; seeing it (for the first time) on the big screen was a real delight. John Heard's best work outside of The Sopranos.
05. Nope feels like it could well be Jordan Peele's finest (and scariest) film to date...until its silly final act. When he cites The Goonies as a key influence, he isn't kidding.
Best so far...
Top tens if 2022 ended now, in early August:
It's so good, it's so good, it's so good, it's so good, it's so good
Lemonade was a perfect translation of the personal/autobiographical into the musical/lyrical; like Plastic Ono Band, an iconic superstar's damage and demons and cathartic passage through them rendered into popular art readily legible to anyone and everyone with a culturally osmosed understanding of said superstar's specific domestic and professional circumstances. In lieu of primal scream therapy Beyoncé smashed shit up with a baseball bat; "Hold On," "Hold Up," mummy issues, daddy issues, heroin withdrawals, Becky with the Good Hair, "You ain't married to no average bitch, boy," "God is a concept by which we measure our pain," etc. etc. And, naturally, both Grand Statements were replete with Great Songs too, Bey's strong suit going back to the early days of Destiny's Child and John's(/Paul's) going back to the Cavern Club and Hamburg.
The shock of the 2014 self-titled record that preceded Lemonade wasn't that of the ultra-personal but more formally of an all-time great Singles Artist who wasn't above inserting filler alongside forever cuts like "Crazy in Love," "Halo," and "Countdown" deciding she wanted to be our foremost Album Artist, give or take her husband and Kanye. Try to find an objectively weak track on Beyoncé. You can't. The same goes for Renaissance. It's all fantastic, start to finish, from "I pull up in these clothes, look so good / 'cause I'm that ho" to "I Feel Love," even if nothing here jumps out quite as urgently and immediately as "Flawless," "Partition," or "Drunk in Love." What that means is that her transformation into full-on Album Artist is now complete, with the best unflagging dance-pop LP this side of Robyn and Kylie.
In any case, there are plenty of great songs here, though which ones register as such may shift from listen to listen. Right now, my favourites are "Cozy," "Alien Superstar," "Cuff It," "Thique," "America Has a Problem," and "Summer Renaissance," but in a few days' time I might cite a totally different half dozen. And while these tracks and others surely bake in enough juicy bits of winking lyrical allusion for seasoned pop-music detectives trained on Lemonade and every Taylor Swift song ever to busy themselves with weeks of exegesis, gone is the personal-as-vulnerable dimension of "The Visual Album." This is Beyoncé the world-beater at the peak(?) of her powers, Beyoncé the consummate producer of pop-music pleasures you haven't experienced before, and Beyoncé the vital Black artist still, at 40, figuring out what exactly it means, or can mean, to be a Black female superstar in a country where racism remains as hardwired in as ever despite the auspicious promise of Barack & Michelle being Eight Years in Power.
She's in the mood to fuck something up, and she's one of the very few celebrity artists – in our post-celebrity/everyone's-a-celebrity age – with the real potential to do so.
Dulce et decorum est...
"It's magnificent," Siegfried Sassoon tells Wilfred Owen after reading his poem "Disabled." "It pierces the heart."
Although Sassoon's own marvelous poetry is present throughout the film –– evoked by memories and experiences and nightmares of war and trauma –– it is only in Benediction's devastating final scene that we hear Owen's poem that so affected Sassoon earlier in the film, underscored by Ralph Vaughn Williams' haunting Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis:
It is magnificent. And it pierces the heart.
Precisely the same may be said of Terence Davies' latest masterpiece. This is one of the greatest films to date by one of the world's greatest living filmmakers, or artists active in any medium; a truly magisterial work of power, sensitivity, real thought, and real feeling.
There Is a World Elsewhere
I was invited to an advance screening of The Northman not as a movie reviewer but in my capacity as a member of a university History department. This makes sense given that, arguably, no other active filmmaker takes the the past as seriously, and as much on its own peculiar terms, as does Robert Eggers.
Yet, in The Witch, The Lighthouse, and now The Northman, Eggers is rigorously committed not only to the standard checklist of "period accuracy" production-design components, he is also singularly focused on getting inside the thought-worlds and proprioceptive experiences of seventeenth-century Puritan New England, a remote nautical outpost in the 1890s, and the visceral landscape of early medieval northern Europe, specifically from the perspective of pre-Christianized Vikings – though, true to period, this modern term is never used (digressing here: anachronistic name notwithstanding, if you happen to be in the Montréal area, this serendipitously timed special exhibition is a must!).
These are immersive visions of (more or less) alien milieux, equal parts awesomely beautiful and awesomely terrifying. And Eggers' films betray remarkably little interest in the concerns, debates, and assumptions of current culture, except insofar as Eggers-the-craftsman-of-spectacles seems to know intuitively how to entrance and thrill modern audiences as well as any contemporary director. The perspectives of these three films and their encoding of meaning belong as far as possible –– Eggers would make a very good professional historian –– to the distant moments in time and space they make palpable and immediate. The Northman's narrative rhythms, its moral tone and internal logic, its eerie beauty and ghoulish grotesquerie all derive from the world of the Icelandic Eddas and of Beowulf, although there are also unmistakable (pre-)echoes of Shakespeare, with the primordial ooze that would much later coalesce into the Hamlet and (to a lesser extent) Macbeth stories mixed in with the mud and blood and bile on screen.
Given an obviously larger budget, a wider canvas on which to create, and a terrific cast of movie stars (including, best of all here, the one of Eggers' own partial making), Eggers compromises or tones down none of his esoteric or idiosyncratic artistic impulses; he delivers his most impressive film yet. As a cinephile, I'd say it's a masterpiece, and also that it's extremely unlikely to be surpassed by any Hollywood release – or film, period? – this year. As an historian of the Early Middle Ages, I wonder if it might be the best, and the most indelibly evocative, movie set in that period – a time before the knights and castles and codes of chivalry that have attracted far more cinematic attention than this stranger, liminal lost epoch separating the High Middle Ages from Roman Late Antiquity.











