Journeys to the Center of the Mind data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfc4/1cfc4e1c64b7681c7fbd09363b525c5e5930e4df" alt=""
Two of the strongest films of 2007 thus far cast front and center the more elusive nooks and crannies of the human psyche. Each, in their own way, deals thoughtfully and even sensitively with the nature of insanity. The question of what exactly it means to "lose" one's mind is something that clearly fascinates both William Friedkin and Satoshi Kon. They take entirely different routes to not entirely dissimilar ends, in the process harnessing distinct national mythologies to make universal points about the mysteries of that strange space between our ears.
Friedkin's most famous film, at once sacreligious and enamored with Catholic ritual, is about the demonic (or Satanic) possession of an innocent little girl in the Washington D.C. area.
Bug, essentially a five-character chamber drama (adapted by Tracy Letts from his play), is a mediation on desperation and paranoia that spirals off in unexpected directions, even as its Oklahoma motel room location remains a constant. Ashley Judd, in a career-redefining performance, plays a hard-luck divorcee, frightened of her abusive ex-con ex-husband, shattered from the disappearance of her young son, and dependent on drugs and liquor just to cope.
She finds a sense of comfort in the company of an enigmatic ex-military drifter (played with slithery charisma by Michael Shannon, in the sort of double-edged turn that will likely make a name for the actor while typecasting him as a weirdo or creep). Together, they feed off the other's insecurity and uneasiness, forging a harrowing, claustrophobic fantasy universe, and retreating deeper and deeper into uncharted psychosexual territory. The shocking final moments affirm that this is, in fact, a romance of sorts--that is, insofar as
Vertigo and
Mulholland Drive and
Crash are romances. There are echoes of Cronenbergian body horror here, and of post-Vietnam efforts like
Coming Home and
Born on the Fourth of July, but
Bug is ultimately a singular moviegoing experience. It's a masterpiece, locked into the zeitgeist and as refreshingly radical as 21st Century American cinema gets.
Satoshi Kon's
Paprika, possibly the most stunning example of Japanese animation I've seen to date, is vastly more enjoyable to look at than
Bug's purposefully austere hotel room. But it's no less disturbing in its implications--about film, psychotherapy, and the state of modern living. Kon's narrative, however, is a hell of a lot harder to synopsize than Letts and Friedkin's. This is sci-fi noir so convoluted as to make the
Matrix movies look downright simplistic by comparison.
And it works.
Paprika is about dreams, and the line between the conscious and unconscious becomes increasingly ambiguous. Near the end of
Bug, there's a shot that should more or less clarify the preceding events for confused audience members. Kon's movie grows progressively more difficult to follow over its final third, a breathlessly sustained series of would-be climactic showdowns. When the denouement finally arrives, you're mostly just impressed that this hallucinatory train of thought hasn't jumped the tracks. While things ostensibly end happily enough, don't mistake this for an optimistic film--you have to sleep sometime.